![]() ![]() The Git installer suggests names like “trunk” for the principal branch, and also that many teams have already made the change away from “master.” So I chose “main.” Easy enough. Frankly, if it hadn’t been for going through the Git installation on one computer and an upgrade on another, I might not have given this issue any more thought.ĭepending on the options you choose when installing Git or upgrading to the latest version, Git will make new repositories with a default branch name that you specify during the installation or upgrade. I have some privilege which does shield me from considerations like this. If there is a way that I can change the principal branch name of my Git repositories to something that won’t offend anyone, I should make that change. That wasn’t the original intent for Git and GitHub, which use the term “master” but not the term “slave.” Still, that association affects the perception of Git and GitHub. Both “master” and “slave” are used in some contexts in computer science. In recent years, there has been talk that the branch name “master” is problematic because of the suggestion of the master-slave relationship. ![]() One of these changes got me to thinking about something I’ve taken for granted for a few years: the name of the default branch in a repository.įor almost as long as I’ve been using Git and GitHub, and long before, the default branch of a repository is called “master.” I never thought I would want to change that branch name. There have been a lot of significant changes with version 2.32. Then I decided I had to upgrade Git on my other computer, which had version 2.14. Users who are switching between branches inside Visual Studio by utilizing the built in Git tooling will experience both performance gains however, users who switch between branches using the command line or an external Git tool will only experience the 30% improvement in solution reload time.I’ve got a new computer, and I installed Git on it. We have also been able to speed up solution reloads by an average of 30%. As of 17.3 this scenario should no longer trigger a solution reload resulting in a quicker branch switching experience. For example, every time a team member used to add/remove projects to/from their branch, the rest of the team would most likely have experienced a solution reload when switching to or from this branch. We reduced the number of branch switches that need solution reloads by an estimate of 80%. ![]() Given this, we have made improvements to 1)avoid reloading solutions for many scenarios by utilizing targeted in place solution updates 2)enhance the solution/projects reload experiences by reducing their time and reducing any corresponding blocking operations. These reloads can take longer depending on what’s involved. Utilizing the Git tooling to switch between branches in Visual Studio involves not only invoking the corresponding Git command for checking out a branch, but also involves invoking necessary project and solution reloads. How to switch between Git branches in Visual Studio 2022 To do that you can utilize any of the following options: To get the most out of these branch switching performance enhancements, make sure to switch between branches utilizing the Git tooling inside of Visual Studio. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |